The Right Alamo Plan

Dear Fellow Texans,

     I am asking you to help me save the Alamo. My name is Rick Range and I am running for Texas General Land Office Commissioner in the Republican Primary on March 6th.


     As you are probably aware, current-Commissioner George P. Bush brought in out-of-state planners who devised a scheme for the Alamo that took the focus entirely off of the 1836 Battle and would have turned the site into a politically correct Disney-style theme park for the City of San Antonio. Now we have another candidate, Davey Edwards, who wants to rid the General Land Office of the Alamo and hand off ownership and control of it to an independent “commission” of unelected bureaucrats. Neither option is acceptable.


     An excellent plan is already available for the Alamo. This plan was passed and funded by the Texas Legislature three years ago. It would close off the streets and remove the traffic, get rid of the freak shows, incorporate a new Battle Museum to display the hundreds of artifacts, and reconstruct the 1836 battle footprint where possible. It is a wonderful plan for the Alamo. 


     When elected I will immediately act to fully implement this plan. It will be one that all Texans can be proud of, and will ensure that the focus of the Alamo will always remain on the world-famous 1836 Battle and the heroic Defenders.


     Due to the dire threat to the Alamo, we need to make this the biggest turnout for a Republican Primary in the history of the state. Texas is an open primary state—any registered voter regardless of party affiliation can vote in this Republican Primary to help save the Alamo.


     I am the conservative in this race. I am strongly Pro-Life, a staunch defender of the Second Amendment, and am adamantly opposed to the removal and destruction of any of our historic monuments and statues. I am also strongly in favor of strict immigration enforcement. For more details go to rickrange.us.


     Together, we can save the Alamo and ensure its role for future posterity. I would be deeply honored to have your vote. Remember the Alamo!


                             Sincerely,

                             Rick Range


P.S.—The Alamo is threatened like it has never been since 1836. Help me defeat the forces of political correctness that are trying to “Reimagine” the Alamo into something it never was. Vote Rick Range on March 6th.

Issues in this race

The Alamo Cannot Afford Another George P. Bush Plan

We originally set up this website/page in order to get the word out about George P. Bush's disastrous Alamo plan since none of the state's news media would cover it. We had also tried to get Davey Edwards to help when we learned that he was running. It was after he had been campaigning for four months and saying absolutely nothing about the Alamo crisis that I was persuaded to get in the race. That was why I entered. I previously had no intention whatsoever of running. After I had entered, and when Davey Edwards realized that the Alamo issue was finally gaining traction, that's when he started to campaign on it. Those are the facts. Do not be misled as to which candidate has been fighting to save the Alamo from the very beginning.   


What's more, Davey Edwards still does not want to have to deal with the Alamo. His latest plan now is to COMPLETELY REMOVE THE ALAMO FROM UNDER THE STEWARDSHIP OF THE TEXAS GENERAL LAND OFFICE AND PLACE IT TOTALLY UNDER THE CONTROL OF SOME UNSPECIFIED "DETAILS TO BE WORKED OUT" INDEPENDENT "COMMISSION." We have already seen how that worked out with George P. Bush when HE handed off responsibility for the Alamo to others. We certainly do not need a repeat of that—unelected bureaucrats deciding the future of the Alamo.   


What Texans need is a hands-on Land Commissioner who will take the responsibility to personally see that the plan is implemented that was passed by the Texas State Legislature—a plan for the Alamo that fully recognizes and honors the world-famous 1836 Battle and the courageous Defenders. The Texas General Land Office Commissioner has that authority. When elected that is exactly what I will do. 
-Rick Range  




A NEW THREAT TO THE ALAMO


There is now a second threat to the Alamo. When spreading the word about our campaign, we need to be certain to include the information that Davey Edwards is absolutely not an option to George P. Bush. This past week, Edwards came out in favor of a plan that would remove the Alamo completely out of the stewardship of the General Land Office and place it under the total control of an independent “details to be worked out” commission—a group of unelected bureaucrats running the Alamo. This plan would be even worse than George P. Bush since this Texas state shrine would no longer be under the control of the State of Texas. If a bad plan emerged for the Alamo, there would be absolutely no recourse for the citizens as there is now where the Land Commissioner can be voted out of office. This would obviously create a worse situation than we currently have under Bush.


Please be sure to emphasize to everybody that they need to not only vote Bush out of office, but that Davey Edwards is definitely not an option. It is imperative that he be stopped so that we do not end up with the situation of a runoff consisting of Bush and Edwards. This really needs to be emphasized at every opportunity because it would be the Alamo's worst nightmare.


Thank you very much for everything that you are doing. Your help is very critical to our success. If you have any questions, please feel free to call me at 972-278-9241 or 214-881-2764. You can also email me at rickrange702@yahoo.com.

- Rick Range



  

COMPARISON OF ALAMO PLANS


Let me make the five most significant Alamo issues very clear by comparing these three plans. 


The Bush REIMAGINE THE ALAMO Plan


  • Initial cost about $450 million—he now says it’s $300 million.
  • Included see-through imported German glass walls around the Alamo Plaza—he now says the walls are out.
  • Included full history of the mission, downplaying the 1836 Battle—he now says the Battle will remain the focus.
  • Included moving the Cenotaph—he now says it might stay on the Alamo grounds.
  • Control has been split among five entities—he now says he’s the boss, but must ask nonprofit boards for permission about openness for meetings and finances. Has changed positions so many times that once the election is over, there is no guarantee what his plan will be.

The Edwards Plan


  • No cost indicated—states that he has no “predetermined” plan.
  • No walls ever mentioned because there is to be no plan for improvement—everything is to be left just as it is: vehicular traffic coursing through the Plaza, the freak shows, no new Battle museum, and no recreation of the 1836 Battle footprint. This once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for the Alamo we’ve dreamt of for years is to be scuttled.
  • He has said little about the history of the Alamo.
  • His plan is to buy the plot of land beneath the Cenotaph from the City of San Antonio.
  • His plan is to hand off control and management of the Alamo from the GLO to an independent “commission” of unelected individuals who cannot be held accountable by the voters.


The Range Plan


  • The cost is around $50 million and is the plan that was presented to, approved by, and funded by the Texas Legislature in 2015.
  • The approved plan includes limestone walls, representing the original.
  • The approved plan includes the intent of the Texas Legislature to honor and respect the 1836 Battle and the heroic Defenders that set in motion the independence of Texas.
  • The Cenotaph will remain exactly where it is. The State of Texas will own the entire Plaza.
  • Control will remain with the Texas GLO with a hands-on Commissioner. The Texas Legislature will then be encouraged to pass a bill mandating that the focus shall remain on the 1836 Battle and its Defenders regardless of who the GLO Commissioner may be.


Response to Davey Edwards' Latest Negative Post

  I really did not want to have to do this. But as a result of Mr. Davey Edwards' most recent Facebook post of November 18th, I feel I have no choice. I can only conclude he did this because he sees the momentum our campaign is gathering across the state.   


I believed that Mr. Edwards and I had a gentlemen's agreement that we would strictly limit our criticism to the real culprit here, George P. Bush. No negative comments about each other, since Bush constitutes the real threat to the Alamo. I even told him he would have my full support if it came down to a runoff between him and Bush. However, since Mr. Edwards has now insinuated that I am "politicizing" the Alamo in order to use it for "political gain," I believe that I owe it to the voters of Texas to tell them the whole story.   


I have been deeply involved in research on the Alamo for almost fifteen years. During the course of this research, a number of associates and I put together a plan which would have properly protected, maintained, and improved the reverence and appreciation for the site as well as reconstruct portions of the 1836 Battle environment where possible. The plan involved a state-of-the-art museum for the hundreds of battle artifacts for which there had been no room for display, as well as visual educational features. Of course as part of this plan, the streets were to be closed off and the Church and Long Barracks properly repaired and protected against further deterioration. The world-famous Battle of 1836 and the heroism of the Defenders were to remain the premier focus.   

Through our efforts, this plan was passed and funded by the Texas State Legislature. Unfortunately, after Mr. Bush came into office, he brought in out-of-state planners who totally disregarded what had been passed by the Legislature and turned the project on its head. At the same time Bush and his minions took the opportunity to turn the whole thing into probably the biggest pork barrel boondoggle in Texas history, turning a project originally projected to cost some 50 million dollars into an outrageously inflated 450 million. (His latest change-with-the-wind statement says 300 million.)    

When the horrendous details of his "REIMAGINE THE ALAMO Master Plan" were finally disclosed during the "Big Reveal" public hearings in San Antonio last Spring, all true Texans were horrified. Unfortunately, there was, outside of Bexar County, absolutely no news coverage of this impending disaster at all. Zero.   

Consequently a few friends and I decided to set up a website, www.savethealamo.us, in an attempt to get the word out to the rest of the citizens of Texas before it was too late. We even bought a series of public radio announcements, all out of our own pocket.   

We, along with other allies, began a diligent search for a well-known public official to run against George P. Bush since he had amply proven that that was what was necessary to save the Alamo. Not a one stepped forward.   

Now about Mr. Edwards—When we learned that Mr. Edwards was running, John Hinnant of San Antonio and I met with him for over two hours in Fort Worth. We explained to him the extreme importance of the Alamo issue and that it was absolutely essential to get the word out to all Texans about it if he was to defeat Bush. He told us that he agreed. Two weeks later, Jerry Patterson and two high ranking Tea Party leaders met with Mr. Edwards in Austin and explained the same thing in detail. Once again, Mr. Edwards indicated that he understood and would do precisely as they suggested.   

After that, we all agreed to support Mr. Edwards in his race. I even had an excellent piece created about the whole Alamo dilemma to be put up on the Edwards website as soon as it was set up.   

Once the website was up, to our astonishment there was not one single word about the Alamo debacle on the site anywhere. Absolutely nothing. And then to compound our concern, Mr. Edwards on the campaign trail repeatedly refused to utter a word about it for weeks, just his experience in surveying land up along the Red River. That was when I finally was persuaded to enter the race. It had absolutely nothing to do with political ambitions—only saving the Alamo. By this point I had already spent thousands of dollars of my own money trying to spread the alarm.   

Due to the effects of our website and our work in explaining the subject on numerous radio talk shows throughout the state, Mr. Edwards realized that the Alamo issue was gaining momentum. That is why he finally started discussing it and using it in his campaign. For him to claim that I am the one trying to use the Alamo for political gain is the very height of hypocrisy—the pot calling the kettle black.   

As far as Mr. Edwards' claimed superiority in "qualifications" for the office, there is a lot more to the Texas General Land Office than just being a surveyor. Land surveyors can be hired. I am fully aware of the duties of the office, and I realize that the stewardship of the Alamo is not the only one—just a hugely important one that is in the most imminent need of correction. And contrary to Mr. Edwards' contention, there is a "predetermined plan" that will fit the bill quite nicely—the one presented to the State Legislature which they passed and funded. There is no need for another person totally unversed in the Alamo to come in and reinvent the wheel. We've already seen how that worked out with Bush.   

What needs to be done is to implement the original plan, and then for future safety get a bill through the State Legislature mandating that the focus of the Alamo will always be the 1836 Battle. And purchasing the land that the Cenotaph stands on as a solution for that problem as Mr. Edwards has now proposed, just shows once again his lack of knowledge of the facts on this issue.    

The state statutes are very clear that no 1936 Centennial Marker can be altered in any fashion and certainly not moved without the express consent and approval of the Texas Historical Commission, and this is the case regardless of whether such marker is on public, private, city, state, or whatever land. The Cenotaph was entirely paid for by State funds gifted by the Roosevelt Administration and is officially listed as Texas 1936 Centennial Marker Number 95. If the City of San Antonio even touches it, they will be in total violation of State Law. Furthermore, the City has reportedly already agreed to cede the entire main plaza to the State, and if not the State would certainly be justified in exercising eminent domain.   

Besides the Alamo, the Texas General Land Office is responsible for several other fields and, unlike Mr. Edwards, I have experience in nearly all of them.

1. Education: I received my bachelor's degree and post-graduate work in teaching and taught in public schools at the junior high and high school levels for a number of years.   

2. Energy: Both my father and grandfather were involved in the field of energy, having founded Range Oil Company which existed for some 65 years and where I myself worked as a youth.   

3. Veterans' Affairs: While I am not an actual armed service veteran, I did spend over 31 years in the role of first responder as a firefighter and also served as Spanish translator for both the police and fire departments. As such, I have experienced many of the same traumatic and stressful situations to which our veterans have been exposed and am very sympathetic to their problems. The plight of veterans is dear to my heart and will be one of my top priorities—especially in the areas of housing and mental health. The tragic suicides have got to end.    

4. History: I will put my expertise and knowledge in the field of history up against just about anyone—and certainly Davey Edwards.   

5. Land: I have had personal experience in the area of oil leasing and mineral rights in my own family.   

6. Coast and Wetlands: I have been a strong proponent of environmental responsibility and pollution prevention for my entire life. Erosion is also a major threat that must be urgently addressed.   

7. Disaster Recovery (flooding, tornadoes, hurricanes, wildfires): As a first responder I have had extensive first-hand experience dealing with the disastrous effects of flooding, tornadoes, and wildfires. I have personally dealt with the devastating results.   

No—I have not ever been a land surveyor. Nor have I ever surveyed land along the Red River. But I do know I have the judgment to bring in the very best people to help me in areas where I am not the best expert. So all in all, I believe that my qualifications at least match those of both of my opponents—if not far surpass them.   

I regret that I had to say all this. I really do not like blowing my own horn. But I will not sit silently by when my personal motives and qualifications are impuned.   

I would be deeply honored to have your vote for Texas General Land Office Commissioner on March 6th 

-  Rick Range.